Academic and scientific conferences
Academic conference management software.
Reviewer assignments · Track B, Security and privacy
Double-blind
- #112Federated evaluation without shared test sets3 of 3Ready
- #118Auditing consent flows in mobile health apps2 of 3COI flagged
- #124Low-resource speech benchmarks, revisited3 of 3Ready
- #131Differential privacy for survey microdata1 of 3Needs reviewers
Suggestions are advisory. A chair approves every assignment before invitations go out.
From call for papers to proceedings.
Every stage of a peer-reviewed program. See also abstract submission and the IEEE proceedings guide.
Call for papers
Tracks, submission types and deadlines, drafted from your CFP text or set up by hand.
Abstract and paper submission
Authors save drafts, add co-authors, upload files and follow each submission's status.
Peer review
Open, single-blind or double-blind review with your own review forms, reminders and rebuttals.
Reviewer assignment and conflicts
Suggestions ranked by topic and workload, conflict-of-interest checks, and a chair who approves each assignment.
Decisions and camera-ready
Scores, reviews and rebuttals side by side, decision emails, then camera-ready upload for accepted papers.
Proceedings
IEEE copyright forms and a proceedings delivery package built from accepted papers, where enabled.
Call for papers and abstract management.
Paste your call for papers and the setup assistant drafts tracks, deadlines and roles for you to check.
- Tracks, submission types and deadlines
- Abstract and full-paper submission with co-authors and drafts
- Authors see the status of every submission
Event setup · Drafted from your brief
Not yet published
- Event type
- Conference with call for papers
- Tracks
- Full papers · Short papers · Workshops
- Abstract deadline
- 14 March
- Registration opens
- 1 April
- Review
- Double-blind, three reviewers per paper
Every drafted field is reviewed by an organizer before anything is published.
Peer review and conflicts of interest.
Reviewer suggestions are ranked by topic and workload; the program chair approves every assignment.
- Open, single-blind or double-blind review, set per conference. In double-blind review, reviewers do not see author identities.
- Authors and co-authors cannot review their own submissions. Shared affiliations and past co-authorship are flagged before assignment.
- Your own review forms, minimum and maximum reviewers per paper, deadlines and reminder emails.
- A rebuttal window with dates and a length limit you set, then discussion before the decision.
- Every decision is recorded against the paper, with the reviews behind it.
From accepted papers to the agenda.
Build the conference agenda from the papers you accepted, without re-entering them.
- Accepted papers become sessions in the schedule builder
- Room and speaker clashes flagged before you publish
- A schedule optimizer can draft the agenda around keynotes
Schedule builder · Day 1
1 conflict- 09:00Opening keynote
- 10:30Product roadmapCustomer panel
- 13:30Security and compliancePartner workshopSpeaker overlap
- 15:30Breakout · AnalyticsBreakout · Integrations
Registration and check-in.
The same platform runs registration, payments and check-in for the conference itself.
- Author, student and member ticket types
- Visa invitation letters for international attendees, where enabled
- QR check-in and attendance certificates
Check-in · Main entrance
Scanner 2
Last scan
Checked in
Sample Attendee
Full summit pass
08:42
Previous scan
Already used
This ticket was checked in at 08:31.
08:40
Checked in
612
Expected
964
Remaining
352
Each QR ticket is signed and can be checked in once.
Reporting for the program committee.
Close the conference with the numbers your committee and society ask for.
- Submission, review and acceptance figures
- Registration and attendance
- Certificates issued, and CSV exports
Report · After the event
CSV export
- Registrations
- 1,128
- Checked in
- 612
- Sessions held
- 42
- Submissions received
- 212
- Certificates issued
- 590
Book a demo for your conference.
Bring your call for papers timeline, review model and committee roles. We will set up the demo around them.